When Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February, many Palestinians felt this warfare considerations them immediately. Over the previous 9 months, they’ve seen direct parallels between their very own expertise of occupation and army violence and the Ukrainians’.
Whether or not it’s the focusing on of civilian housing, colleges, non secular buildings, and many others; the destruction of {the electrical} grid as a type of collective punishment; accusations of utilizing civilians as “reside shields” when the demise toll climbs; or the occupation energy denying the nationhood and statehood of the occupied, the similarities are obvious.
However not for the Ukrainian authorities. The truth is, shortly after the beginning of the warfare, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy made it clear that he recognized the plight of Ukraine with that of Israel. “The risk is similar: for each us and also you – the whole destruction of the folks, state, tradition,” he mentioned.
Kyiv’s Western allies, media and worldwide organisations have additionally taken the identical place. They’ve backed Ukraine full-heartedly and have pretended that there isn’t any equivalence with Palestine’s state of affairs.
The Palestinians have publicly expressed their outrage at these double requirements and their reactions have been interpreted as help for Russia. However Palestinians aren’t actually taking a stance right here. They’re simply uninterested in Western hypocrisy that is aware of no limits.
Russia ‘brutalises’, Israel ‘defends’
When Russia invaded Ukraine, there was hardly any hesitation within the West about what it wanted to do. It instantly condemned Moscow because the aggressor and accepted Ukraine because the sufferer. The haste and the declared ethical readability with which this judgement was handed stunned Palestinians, who for many years have been listening to the identical Western chorus about Israeli aggression: “Israel has the suitable to defend itself”.
The West has unequivocally supported Ukrainian resistance and has not hesitated to name it that. But, it’s troublesome to disregard the truth that folks resisting the Russian occupation of Jap Ukraine have been known as “partisans”, whereas Palestinians doing the identical in Palestine – armed or unarmed – have at all times been framed as “terrorists”.
Western politicians appear to have been on alert across the clock, able to condemn instantly any Russian bombardment that causes civilian casualties. Certainly, such condemnations are justified and should be made, however they’ve been conspicuously absent when Israel engages in its routine wars on Gaza and massacres Palestinian kids, ladies and men.
Western leaders, like French President Emmanuel Macron, have declared that warfare crimes have been dedicated in Ukraine, not even ready for UN or different official investigations to conclude. The EU has known as for a particular tribunal to prosecute warfare crimes in Ukraine and has supported an ICC investigation into the matter. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has condemned “Russia’s brutality towards Ukraine” and mentioned it shouldn’t be “normalised”.
However the US authorities doesn’t appear to thoughts violence dedicated towards Palestinian civilians, whether or not by way of bombardment or extrajudicial killings by the Israeli military. These crimes have neither been named nor condemned. Worse but, Blinken and his predecessors have overtly objected to an ICC investigation of Israeli warfare crimes in Palestine and even threatened the courtroom.
The US, together with different Western powers, have additionally routinely ignored Palestinian calls to implement the a whole lot of resolutions the UN has handed in favour of their rights. What’s extra, Israel’s violation of worldwide regulation, generally, has not been sanctioned by the West. Quite the opposite, it appears to be rewarded with ever-closer ties, army help and intensive commerce.
For many years, Western powers have additionally lined up for Israel’s unlawful annexation of Palestinian land. But in September, they had been fast to reject Moscow’s annexation of 4 areas in Jap Ukraine. Most ridiculously, Israel joined them in condemning the transfer, regardless of its personal unlawful annexation practices.
Washington then thought it crucial to publicly reject any comparisons between Israel and Russia, when a UN report claiming “de facto” annexation of the West Financial institution was launched.
One aspect in Ukraine, either side in Palestine
The Western double requirements on Ukraine and Palestine have, in fact, prolonged to Western media. Main shops have readily adopted the language their politicians have chosen to make use of for the warfare in Ukraine, simply as they’ve for Palestine.
All these years, Western TV channels and newspapers have hidden behind the concepts of “steadiness” and “objectivity”, to keep away from calling issues as they’re in Palestine: occupation, intentional focusing on of civilians, collective punishment, ethnic cleaning, warfare crimes, and many others.
They’ve talked about “either side” even when Israel has massacred Palestinian civilians or gone into passive voice to cover the perpetrator – as if Palestinians die violent deaths by themselves. The Western media protection of Ukraine has not suffered from the identical vocabulary challenges.
Palestinians have additionally hardly ever appeared on Western TV screens (if in any respect) to elucidate what is going on on the bottom; airtime has been nearly completely reserved for Israeli spokespeople and pro-Israel analysts. And even on social media, which purports to supply platforms at no cost expression, Palestinian voices have been silenced by tech giants like Fb and Twitter.
Then again, Ukrainian politicians, analysts, and civilians have been a daily characteristic of Western broadcasts; absent, in fact, are Russian authorities or pro-government voices. Russian state media has additionally been blocked on main social media platforms.
Western media has not dropped its double requirements even when the protection and lifetime of fellow journalists in Palestine have been in danger. One simply has to have a look at how the assassination of Palestinian journalist Shereen Abu Akleh was reported on. Shereen was “killed whereas masking a raid”, one report says and follows with a quote from an Israeli spokesperson, saying that she and her colleagues “had been armed with cameras”.
The killings of journalists in Ukraine have rightfully been condemned by Western media. Nonetheless, there have been no quotes hooked up from Russian officers claiming they deserved their deaths.
Boycott Russia, embrace Israel
Within the aftermath of the invasion of Ukraine, Russia confronted an unprecedented marketing campaign of sanctions and boycotts led by the West. Russian firms and people had been placed on sanctions lists, numerous monetary providers for Russians had been blocked, and even Russian oil and gasoline imports had been curbed.
Many multinationals pulled out of the Russian market and divested from its economic system, whereas governments sought to minimise commerce with Moscow.
For years, Palestinians have dreamed of the sort of motion in defence of their rights. They’ve been calling for sanctions to be imposed on Israel as a response to its occupation of Palestinian lands and its regime of apartheid, however to no avail. Essentially the most the EU, for instance, has achieved is impose obligatory labelling for merchandise coming from unlawful Israeli settlements constructed on Palestinian land.
The boycott marketing campaign towards Russia has additionally been remarkably wide-ranging and fast. Russian residents, whether or not or not they help the warfare in Ukraine, have been barred from worldwide occasions and engagement within the fields of schooling, tradition and sports activities. The Russian soccer crew, which certified for the World Cup play-offs and will have made it to Qatar 2022, was even barred from enjoying in FIFA’s match.
In contrast, not solely have Palestinian requires a boycott of their Israeli aggressor fallen on deaf ears but additionally athletes who’ve determined to interact in particular person acts of boycott of Israel have been threatened and sanctioned.
Within the uncommon moments the place solidarity with the Palestinians has had a large and visual presence at a global sporting occasion, it has been attacked. Most not too long ago, the Moroccan crew, which celebrated its victories within the World Cup by elevating the Palestinian flag, confronted accusations of anti-Semitism in German media. After all, elevating the Ukrainian flag has by no means been a explanation for concern for German or different Western media shops.
Boycotting Russia has additionally been sanction-free. Palestinians and their supporters, alternatively, have needed to pay a heavy value for constructing and main the worldwide Boycott, Divestment, Sanction (BDS) motion, as they’ve confronted not solely smear campaigns and slander, but additionally outright authorities hostility in locations like Germany, France the US, and the UK.
Certainly, over the previous 9 months, Western hypocrisy has been on infinite show. Palestinians didn’t want the Ukrainian warfare to know that they’re handled in a different way, that their lives don’t matter, and that worldwide regulation doesn’t apply to them. However this battle was maybe the ultimate act that pulled down the façade the West used to cowl its duplicity.
The Palestinians don’t blame Ukrainians for this state of affairs, though their authorities ought to know higher than to hunt favour with Israel. Already that has confirmed fruitless, diplomatically and militarily.
The Palestinians, who’ve lengthy suffered from Israeli wars and occupation, want for the warfare in Ukraine to finish, for Ukraine to be free. They stand in solidarity with the victims.
But, they can’t disguise their resentment on the unfair remedy they’ve obtained. Palestinian lives should matter to the remainder of the world as a lot as Ukrainian lives do. Warfare crimes and occupation should be condemned in Ukraine, but additionally in Palestine.
The West should perceive that biased, selective software of worldwide regulation and anti-war motion solely additional encourage aggressors to commit violations.
The views expressed on this article are the writer’s personal and don’t essentially mirror Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.